Find out about all the possibilities for your brand
Leave your contact and we will contact you within one business day
By clicking on button, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and our Privacy Policy
Brands Move Into Historic Buildings: Where Does Adaptation End and Erasure Begin?
Historic buildings are becoming attractive locations for global brands. They offer something that a new development cannot easily reproduce: a strong sense of place, architectural character and a connection with the history of a city. For retailers, this can become a powerful part of the customer experience. For cities, commercial use can give historic properties a viable contemporary function.
But heritage creates a specific challenge for branding. A global company needs a space that reflects its identity, operational requirements and customer experience. A historic building already has an identity of its own.
The conflict is therefore not simply between old architecture and contemporary design. It is between two systems of identity. The more strongly a brand imposes its own visual language, the greater the risk that the building becomes a backdrop. Yet preserving every element unchanged can make adaptation commercially difficult.
There is also a wider urban question. A successful flagship can attract visitors and investment, while rising commercial value can put pressure on smaller businesses and change the character of the surrounding area.
For NZR Retail & Branding, the central question is therefore not whether global brands should occupy historic buildings, but how far a brand can transform a place before it begins to erase what made that place valuable in the first place.
The building already has an identity
A historic building communicates before the customer sees a logo. Its proportions, materials, façade and relationship with the street form an existing visual language.
UNIQLO's Meir flagship in Antwerp offers a recent example of this approach. Opened in September 2025, the store occupies the historic Osterrieth House, a protected heritage building in the heart of the city's main shopping district. Rather than replacing its historic character with a standardised retail environment, the project retains elements including the Rococo façade, marble fireplaces, plaster ceilings and historic paintings, while introducing a contemporary retail experience. The result places UNIQLO's modern visual identity within an architectural context that remains recognisably its own.
UNIQLO's Meir flagship in Antwerp offers a recent example of this approach. Opened in September 2025, the store occupies the historic Osterrieth House, a protected heritage building in the heart of the city's main shopping district. Rather than replacing its historic character with a standardised retail environment, the project retains elements including the Rococo façade, marble fireplaces, plaster ceilings and historic paintings, while introducing a contemporary retail experience. The result places UNIQLO's modern visual identity within an architectural context that remains recognisably its own.
Brioni's Mayfair flagship takes another approach. The Italian fashion house occupies a Grade II-listed Georgian townhouse dating from 1736, combining the existing architecture with Italian materials and furniture. Rather than hiding the contrast between the building and the brand, the design makes that contrast part of the experience.
There is evidence that historic character can have commercial value. A 2015 study by Retnasih S. Adiwibowo, Pribadi Widodo and Imam Santosa, published in Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, examined two historic buildings in Bandung, Indonesia, that had been converted into factory outlets. The researchers analysed 148 valid questionnaires from visitors. They found a significant positive correlation between appreciation of the historic buildings and intention to visit the stores: Spearman's rho was 0.601 for Edward Forrer and 0.418 for Heritage Factory Outlet.
The implication is important for retail design: heritage does not necessarily compete with branding. It can become part of the reason for visiting the space.
There is evidence that historic character can have commercial value. A 2015 study by Retnasih S. Adiwibowo, Pribadi Widodo and Imam Santosa, published in Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, examined two historic buildings in Bandung, Indonesia, that had been converted into factory outlets. The researchers analysed 148 valid questionnaires from visitors. They found a significant positive correlation between appreciation of the historic buildings and intention to visit the stores: Spearman's rho was 0.601 for Edward Forrer and 0.418 for Heritage Factory Outlet.
The implication is important for retail design: heritage does not necessarily compete with branding. It can become part of the reason for visiting the space.
Preservation can also become superficial
The opposite problem is façadism: preserving a historic façade while replacing much of the building behind it. The street may retain its familiar image, while the original spatial and material identity disappears.
A broader view comes from a 2023 systematic literature review by Fatemeh Vafaie, Hilde Remøy and Vincent Gruis, published in Habitat International. The researchers started with 731 publications and selected 72 studies for their final analysis. They identified ten groups of factors affecting the success of adaptive reuse, including architectural, socio-cultural, economic, environmental, authenticity and functional factors.
This makes the problem more complex than simply deciding what part of a building should be preserved. A successful intervention has to balance heritage with the building's new function and economic reality.
The same question appears at the level of visual identity. Historic interiors are often already visually complex, with decorative details, original materials and accumulated layers of history. Adding corporate colours, large-scale signage, digital displays and contemporary furniture can create an effective contrast, but it can also produce visual competition. The result depends on hierarchy: whether new elements complement the architectural character or demand attention from it.
Apple's restoration of the 1927 Tower Theatre in Los Angeles demonstrates one possible approach. The former cinema was adapted into an Apple Store while elements such as the ceiling dome, plasterwork, marble columns and stained glass were restored. The contemporary brand experience was introduced without eliminating the features that made the building recognisable. Here, the historic character becomes part of what differentiates the location from a standardised store.
A broader view comes from a 2023 systematic literature review by Fatemeh Vafaie, Hilde Remøy and Vincent Gruis, published in Habitat International. The researchers started with 731 publications and selected 72 studies for their final analysis. They identified ten groups of factors affecting the success of adaptive reuse, including architectural, socio-cultural, economic, environmental, authenticity and functional factors.
This makes the problem more complex than simply deciding what part of a building should be preserved. A successful intervention has to balance heritage with the building's new function and economic reality.
The same question appears at the level of visual identity. Historic interiors are often already visually complex, with decorative details, original materials and accumulated layers of history. Adding corporate colours, large-scale signage, digital displays and contemporary furniture can create an effective contrast, but it can also produce visual competition. The result depends on hierarchy: whether new elements complement the architectural character or demand attention from it.
Apple's restoration of the 1927 Tower Theatre in Los Angeles demonstrates one possible approach. The former cinema was adapted into an Apple Store while elements such as the ceiling dome, plasterwork, marble columns and stained glass were restored. The contemporary brand experience was introduced without eliminating the features that made the building recognisable. Here, the historic character becomes part of what differentiates the location from a standardised store.
When regeneration changes the neighbourhood
The effects can extend beyond the property itself.
Research by Dilek Özdemir and İrem Selçuk, published in Cities in 2017, examined the historic centre of Kadıköy in Istanbul after a pedestrianisation and revitalisation project. Their 2014 research combined land-use analysis, surveys of pedestrians and shopkeepers, and interviews with the local retailers' association. Between 2004 and 2014, 104 of 317 shops changed function, roughly one third of the total. The researchers connected rising rents with the replacement of some smaller businesses by domestic and international chains and eating and drinking establishments.
The finding does not mean that international brands inevitably displace local businesses. It shows that preserving historic architecture and preserving the commercial identity of a neighbourhood are different challenges.
This distinction is particularly relevant to large brands because their presence can become part of a broader transformation. A flagship may restore an underused building, increase footfall and attract investment, while the same increase in commercial value makes the area less accessible to smaller operators. The architectural identity of the neighbourhood can therefore remain intact even as its commercial identity changes.
Research by Dilek Özdemir and İrem Selçuk, published in Cities in 2017, examined the historic centre of Kadıköy in Istanbul after a pedestrianisation and revitalisation project. Their 2014 research combined land-use analysis, surveys of pedestrians and shopkeepers, and interviews with the local retailers' association. Between 2004 and 2014, 104 of 317 shops changed function, roughly one third of the total. The researchers connected rising rents with the replacement of some smaller businesses by domestic and international chains and eating and drinking establishments.
The finding does not mean that international brands inevitably displace local businesses. It shows that preserving historic architecture and preserving the commercial identity of a neighbourhood are different challenges.
This distinction is particularly relevant to large brands because their presence can become part of a broader transformation. A flagship may restore an underused building, increase footfall and attract investment, while the same increase in commercial value makes the area less accessible to smaller operators. The architectural identity of the neighbourhood can therefore remain intact even as its commercial identity changes.
When the relationship becomes controversial
There are also cases where the conflict becomes impossible to ignore.
These cases are different in scale and nature, but both demonstrate the same tension: the requirements of a global brand do not disappear when the setting is historic. The question is how those requirements are introduced without treating heritage as merely a resource for the brand to use.
In London, Marks & Spencer's proposal to demolish its Oxford Street store and replace it with a new mixed-use building became a major heritage dispute. The proposal was opposed by heritage campaigners, while M&S argued for the need to replace the existing building. The case reached the High Court in 2024 after the Secretary of State had refused planning permission, citing, among other issues, the loss of Orchard House as a non-designated heritage asset.
These cases are different in scale and nature, but both demonstrate the same tension: the requirements of a global brand do not disappear when the setting is historic. The question is how those requirements are introduced without treating heritage as merely a resource for the brand to use.
In London, Marks & Spencer's proposal to demolish its Oxford Street store and replace it with a new mixed-use building became a major heritage dispute. The proposal was opposed by heritage campaigners, while M&S argued for the need to replace the existing building. The case reached the High Court in 2024 after the Secretary of State had refused planning permission, citing, among other issues, the loss of Orchard House as a non-designated heritage asset.
A different incident occurred during preparations for a Louis Vuitton fashion show at Barcelona's Park Güell in 2024. A section of historic stone wall was damaged during installation work. The city described it as human error, and Louis Vuitton paid €3,552 for the repair.
These cases are different in scale and nature, but both demonstrate the same tension: the requirements of a global brand do not disappear when the setting is historic. The question is how those requirements are introduced without treating heritage as merely a resource for the brand to use.
Beyond retail: when companies occupy historic infrastructure
The same logic extends beyond flagship stores. Amazon's restoration of the former Lord & Taylor building at 424 Fifth Avenue in New York shows how a company can adapt a landmarked commercial building for a completely different contemporary function.
The 1914 department store was designated a New York City landmark before Amazon converted it into a workplace. Significant architectural elements were preserved while new technical infrastructure was introduced for modern office use.
For large companies, this broadens the question from retail design to the way corporate infrastructure interacts with cities. The same principles apply to offices, hospitality spaces, cultural venues and other commercial environments: the new function has to work, but the existing character also influences how that function is perceived.
For NZR Retail & Branding, this is where branding and spatial design meet. A company's physical presence is not experienced separately from its location. The building, its history and its surroundings can all become part of the brand experience, whether deliberately or not.
The 1914 department store was designated a New York City landmark before Amazon converted it into a workplace. Significant architectural elements were preserved while new technical infrastructure was introduced for modern office use.
For large companies, this broadens the question from retail design to the way corporate infrastructure interacts with cities. The same principles apply to offices, hospitality spaces, cultural venues and other commercial environments: the new function has to work, but the existing character also influences how that function is perceived.
For NZR Retail & Branding, this is where branding and spatial design meet. A company's physical presence is not experienced separately from its location. The building, its history and its surroundings can all become part of the brand experience, whether deliberately or not.
The Next Life of a Historic Space
The examples show that there is no single formula for successful interaction between global brands and historic buildings. The answer is not to preserve everything unchanged, but neither is it to reduce heritage to a façade.
The strongest projects begin by recognising that the building already communicates something. Its architectural character, history and relationship with the surrounding city are not obstacles to branding. They are part of the context in which the brand will be experienced.
This means that the brief for a heritage retail project should begin with questions rather than visual solutions: What is essential to preserve? What can be transformed? Where should the brand be visible? Where should it step back? And what will the project change beyond the boundaries of the building?
From NZR Retail & Branding's perspective, heritage can be treated as a strategic element of brand experience rather than as decoration. A historic building can give a global brand authenticity, differentiation and a stronger connection with a specific city. But those advantages can disappear if the building is reduced to a themed backdrop.
The opposite extreme is equally problematic. If preservation prevents the space from functioning commercially, the building may retain its physical character but lose its relevance to contemporary urban life.
The objective, then, is not to make a historic building look modern or a modern brand look historic. It is to find a relationship in which both identities remain visible.
Perhaps the more interesting question is what happens after the project is completed. Does the new brand become another layer in the history of the building, or does the building gradually become another expression of the brand? The answer may depend less on the architecture itself than on how carefully the relationship between place, business and identity is designed.
The strongest projects begin by recognising that the building already communicates something. Its architectural character, history and relationship with the surrounding city are not obstacles to branding. They are part of the context in which the brand will be experienced.
This means that the brief for a heritage retail project should begin with questions rather than visual solutions: What is essential to preserve? What can be transformed? Where should the brand be visible? Where should it step back? And what will the project change beyond the boundaries of the building?
From NZR Retail & Branding's perspective, heritage can be treated as a strategic element of brand experience rather than as decoration. A historic building can give a global brand authenticity, differentiation and a stronger connection with a specific city. But those advantages can disappear if the building is reduced to a themed backdrop.
The opposite extreme is equally problematic. If preservation prevents the space from functioning commercially, the building may retain its physical character but lose its relevance to contemporary urban life.
The objective, then, is not to make a historic building look modern or a modern brand look historic. It is to find a relationship in which both identities remain visible.
Perhaps the more interesting question is what happens after the project is completed. Does the new brand become another layer in the history of the building, or does the building gradually become another expression of the brand? The answer may depend less on the architecture itself than on how carefully the relationship between place, business and identity is designed.